• 목록
• 답변
• 글쓰기
• 게시판 리스트 옵션
  • 수정
  • 삭제

For many students in IGNOU, the review of literature is often the most difficult component of their project. This is particularly true when working on an ignou mcom assignment, where academic depth is expected. However, guidance usually isn't clear. Students usually ask whether they must summarize books, revise journal articles, or simply take notes of quotations. The reality lies somewhere in between, and knowing that the difference can impact the quality of the entire project.

A review of literature is not written to show the amount of material you've read. It is written to show that you are knowledgeable about the previous work that pertains to your topic and how your project fits in. IGNOU evaluations look at this chapter, as it illustrates your ability to link theories with research direction.

Understanding the Purpose of Review of Literature

Before beginning any writing, it must be understood why this particular chapter is required in an ignou mcom project. The review of literature serves three primary purposes.

In the first place, it indicates that the subject you chose has been researched before and has a scientific significance. Second, it aids you detect gaps or deficiencies in earlier research. The third is that it creates a base for your research objectives and your methodology.

Many students see this chapter as a formality and copy content from previous assignments or web-based sources. This usually leads to small marks or project failure. IGNOU expects original writing even in discussions of studies already completed.

What IGNOU Expects in Literature Review

IGNOU does not expect students to write on the scale of a PhD thesis. The same time explaining in the simplest way is being discouraged. For an ignou MCOM project, the review of literature should reflect a postgraduate level of understanding.

You're expected to study books, research papers journals, reports, and, sometimes, government publications relevant to your research area. The concentrate should be on studies that directly link to your research field.

For example, if your study is about the financial performance of banks In your literature review, you should concentrate on studies that have been conducted previously related to financial ratios, efficiency of banks, profitability analyses, and risk assessment.

Selecting Relevant Literature Sources

One common mistake students make is selecting too many unrelated sources. The quality of the information is more important than the quantity. For an ignou-mcom project roughly fifteen to twenty reliable sources will suffice in the event that they are carefully selected.

An excellent source of information is academic journals popular books written by well-known writers, RBI publications, government reports, and even university research papers. Websites that are not clear on authorship should be avoided.

Always prefer recent studies and ideally, from the last 10 years. Other studies from the past may be considered only if they are foundational in terms of.

Organizing the Review of Literature Chapter

A well-organized chapter will improve quality of reading and impression. Instead of composing short summaries that are not organized, divide all the reviews of books into sensible sections.

You can arrange the chapter around themes, a time period techniques, methodologies, or variables examined. For instance, one section could focus on studies related profit, while another could concentrate on liquidity, and yet another is focused on operating efficiency.

This structure aids evaluators in understanding that you're not replicating content but are actually analyzing it.

Writing Style for IGNOU Literature Review

The style of writing is academic, but simple. Avoid a heavy use of language or unnecessary terminology. IGNOU is a firm believer in simplicity over clarity.

Each study you discuss should include the name of its author, the year of study, the objective, methodology, as well as important findings. However, don't list the findings in a way that is purely mechanical. You should try to link one study with a different one.

For instance, when discussing an article, you can refer to how an author's findings were supported or refuted these findings. This comparative approach adds the depth of your ignou project.

Avoiding Common Writing Mistakes

A common mistake is to write the literature review in the form of an academic chapter. It is important to clarify the basic concepts, such as what accounting is and the meaning of management is not appropriate in this article unless they are directly linked to other studies.

Another error is over-quoting. Your review of literature should be written by you in Your own voice. A phrasing style shows understanding, whereas using copying can show dependency.

They also fail to link sources to their own research topics. Each study you reference should have a clear link to your goals for the project.

Interlinking Literature Review with Research Gap

One of the most important results of a review of literature is to identify the research gap. IGNOU examiners are expecting you to identify what earlier researchers didn't know or indicate where additional research is required.

After discussing multiple studies, you'll notice that the majority of research was focused on large companies smaller firms were ignored. And earlier studies used secondary data but primary data was not as extensive.

This is why it's the main reason for your IGNOU mcom project. Without it, your work will seem repetitive.

Use of Citations and Referencing

In writing a review of literature it is important to use a proper citation. IGNOU generally accepts APA style, but the consistency is more important than perfection.

Each study that is discussed should be included in the reference list at the end of the project. Without references, there is a chance to doubt the authenticity.

Avoid footnotes for literature review. In text citation works better and appears better in an ignou mcom project.

Length of Review of Literature Chapter

Students often inquire about how long their literature reviews should last. There's not a standard for length that can be followed, however for an assignment in mcom, this chapter generally ranges from fifteen hundred up to two thousand words.

The length of the discussion should be based on the complexity of the topic. A topic that is more extensive requires more research while a more narrowly-focused topic requires fewer but more in-depth discussions.

The need to write lengthy reviews that do not include analysis is not going to improve your marks.

Example of Literature Review Writing Approach

Instead of writing as this
Author A researched banking's performance and obtained good results

Write this in the same way as
Author A performed a study examining bank performance with financial ratios. He found that profitability improved because of improved asset management. This conclusion was later validated by Author B, who emphasized the role of operating efficiency in boosting bank returns.

This method is based on an understanding and analysis that is appreciated in an mcom project.

Maintaining Originality and Academic Integrity

IGNOU MCOM project synopsis (http://peoplelife.sakura.ne.jp) takes plagiarism very seriously. Many projects are deferred or even rejected due to review of literature that has been copied. Even if the reference is to other studies, your language is yours.

Utilize plagiarism checking tools when feasible and revise content until it sounds natural. A slightly imperfect sentence can be better than perfect copied.

Final Review Before Submission

Before submitting your ignou mcom project, go through the literature review attentively. You should determine whether the research is relevant, if the flow is logical and whether the chapter leads naturally to your research objectives.

Ask yourself one simple question. Does this chapter clarify the reasons why my study is required. If yes it's on the right track.

Closing Thoughts

Reviewing literature for an ignou MCOM project may be daunting at first particularly for students who are returning to college after a long absence. But once you know that it's more about analysis and connecting than memorizing information, the task can be accomplished.

Take time to read, think and write in your unique voice. This is reflected on the final piece and frequently makes the difference between one that is average and a good one.